Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '18 at 10:36
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 164 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 652 58% 490 Pts	64-Core 1,294 80% 1,294 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W8100 (FireGL V) 34 User benchmarks, average bench 31% AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.3% Below average	Lighting 36.2 Reflection 48.6 Parallax 51.5 30% 45.4 fps	MRender 45.6 Gravity 37 Splatting 62 41% 48.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 83 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 44 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 67 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43434948	99.7% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 409 Mixed 422 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 45.4 151% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 78.1 DQ Mixed 21.7 55% 120 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 366GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 83 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 45 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 68 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 554784293	101% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 406 Mixed 422 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 45.3 149% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 96.4 101% 167 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 145 145 21503017320 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 99 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 83 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 45 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 99 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 99 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 146030002207 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	109% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 187 Mixed 170 138% 184 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.23 115% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x16GB 354 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 56.9 MC Write 51.8 MC Mixed 45.9 147% 51.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 17.7 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	38x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16