PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Gigabyte Z87X-UD3H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130417 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Apr 12 '18 at 22:26 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gigabyte(1458 3554) 2GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.2%
Above average
|
||||
43.3%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 366x |
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 223x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 111x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 99x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 71x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 69x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $215 |