| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160531 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 15 '18 at 15:07 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | TWN-User |
| Background CPU | 59% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.3%
Good
|
55% 85.1 Pts
|
27% 217 Pts
|
2% 40.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2981) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.6%
Above average
|
57% 71.5 fps
|
54% 66.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
48.2%
Average
|
59% 267 MB/s
|
62% 19 MB/s
|
47% 82.1 MB/s
|
|
|
61.7%
Good
|
78% 103 MB/s
|
108% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
|
41.6%
Average
|
54% 72.2 MB/s
|
28% 0.32 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.6%
Very poor
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
8% 2.77 GB/s
|
61% 65.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 155x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 65x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |