Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock AB350M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170830
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 17:20
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	66% Good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 193 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 568 53% 443 Pts	64-Core 634 39% 634 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 30 Parallax 40.8 34% 37.3 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 35.3 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1603 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 815 (B1) Unknown 93 93 35 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 48 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 33 33 67366 (EB) Unknown 99 99 165 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8236457677	44.8% Average	Read 420 Write 50.7 Mixed 82.5 39% 185 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 8.01 67% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 54.3 DQ Mixed 17.4 43% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 110%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 253GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 164 6575 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7161 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11033 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3820 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1625 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 142 142 176658 (C2) HDA temperature 120 92 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.2% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 50.3 Mixed 63.7 44% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.14 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 63%
WD WD3202ABYS-02B7A0 320GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 92GB free Firmware: 02.03B03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 16 (03) Spinup time 192 175 1383 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1955 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3603 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1561 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 475 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1479 (C2) HDA temperature 109 93 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.5% Average	Read 92.8 Write 79.4 Mixed 75.1 62% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.3 91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 30.1 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 20 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	294x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	125x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	144x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	119x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	50x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	43x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $458

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16