Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160620
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '18 at 06:48
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	MLT-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 87.7 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 647 66% 534 Pts	64-Core 646 40% 646 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6170) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.7% Very good	Lighting 99 Reflection 109 Parallax 104 81% 104 fps	MRender 95 Gravity 88.5 Splatting 90.7 75% 91.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6573 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 961 (B1) Unknown 94 94 30 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 43 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30317024929	53.3% Above average	Read 447 Write 135 Mixed 174 55% 252 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 11.5 60% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 27.3 71% 154 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 813GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 131 131 34388509109 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3824 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3639 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 487 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5700 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5700 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 249109348396 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	95.4% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 162 Mixed 153 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.19 74% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 584GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 231529944 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4312 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1586459 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6363 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 964 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 64 50 605290532 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 16119 (C2) HDA temperature 36 50 60129542180 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 112158775970866 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6937367443 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3707299064	88.8% Excellent	Read 160 Write 150 Mixed 148 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.21 75% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46 47,721 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 23.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 21.7 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	392x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	382x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	353x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	400x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	348x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	115x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	56x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16