Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '18 at 07:13
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 412 56% 414 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Lighting 34.1 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 41.8 28% 35.9 fps	MRender 31.9 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 36 28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gloway FER120GS3-S7 120GB 440 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0112 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 204 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 193 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 101 (C2) HDA temperature 60 60 171801313320 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 700 (F2) Unknown 100 100 654	78.5% Very good	Read 517 Write 252 Mixed 236 73% 335 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 8.71 117% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 12.2 68% 154 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 94%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 37GB free Firmware: WT100-33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 98 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4416 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12515 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 30130 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6252 (BE) vendor-specific 109 61 43 (C2) HDA temperature 109 61 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 31917 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	31.9% Below average	Read 54.9 Write 56 Mixed 35.5 36% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.43 102% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 32%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 38GB free Firmware: WT100-33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4352 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7841 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24803 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4198 (BE) vendor-specific 106 61 44 (C2) HDA temperature 106 61 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 748588 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	23.3% Poor	Read 38.4 Write 42.3 Mixed 35 29% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.37 91% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 18.3 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B85M-DS3H-A Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-DS3H-A

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	250x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	229x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	115x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	182x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	78x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	68x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	49x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	39x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 3,143 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16