Acer Aspire E5-575

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateApr 20 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 279
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 3
3% 3.62 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 6.43
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
184GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 936
Mixed 1,063
250% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 20.8
162% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 21.8
59% 117 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 166%
Great: 236%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 99.6
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.16
62% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
14GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 5.19
Mixed 4.95
9% 9.31 MB/s
4K Read 3.97
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
17% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575 Builds (Compare 941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback