Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16% Very poor	Memory 15.4 1-Core 15.3 2-Core 35.4 13% 22 Pts	4-Core 97.3 8-Core 90.9 13% 94.1 Pts	64-Core 88.4 6% 88.4 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.2 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 16.7 16% 17.3 fps	MRender 21.8 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 15.1 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE30 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15% Very poor	Read 214 Write 31.3 Mixed 52.2 21% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.32 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 1.82 16% 4.11 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.9% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 357 11% 357 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.9% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 564 samples	8x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16