bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '18 at 00:49
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$199
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 151
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 356
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
74GB free
Firmware: MAT0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.03% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 15.2
4% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.38
4K Write 5.45
4K Mixed 5.67
21% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 7.73
DQ Mixed 3.37
5% 8.58 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 110%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 196
Write 139
Mixed 134
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 15
72% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 14.5
22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 77%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
73GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 72.7
Write 72.1
Mixed 22.9
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 71%
Excelstor Technology J8160S 160GB
46GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 51.4
Write 59.5
Mixed 40.6
38% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.35
85% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 40%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
272GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 24.1
Mixed 23.7
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.23
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback