Supermicro C7P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Supermicro C7P67 (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro C7P67
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120423
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '16 at 12:03
Run Duration	368 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345 4,997 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 93.1 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 452 51% 398 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PNY(196E 0974) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3221 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	8.77% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 9.15 Parallax 11.5 8% 10.3 fps	MRender 13.6 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 13 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 332GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 63 133018361 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8090 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 91 60 5682693368 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19652 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 242 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 49 5717272559652 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 172 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8092 (C2) HDA temperature 36 51 -140737488355292 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 21 4 133018361 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.4% Good	Read 135 Write 103 Mixed 19.2 62% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.46 160% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 104%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$58 5,099 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 113GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 186683661 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5263 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 91 60 1353036245 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19629 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 244 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 65 48 22197960739 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 170 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5265 (C2) HDA temperature 35 52 -140737488355293 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 22 3 186683661 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.5% Above average	Read 103 Write 97.2 Mixed 54.4 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.06 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.56 143% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA360 320GB 4,752 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: V54OA73A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 65540 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 121 121 21495546158 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2308 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 48955 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2300 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4577 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4577 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 296353529894 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 57	29.4% Poor	Read 54.8 Write 47.5 Mixed 42.8 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.08 36% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 40%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201R 2TB 408 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 569GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 26.3 Mixed 28.2 36% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.75 4K Mixed 0.33 39% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 55%
Verbatim 32GB 503 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 5.71 Mixed 9.06 14% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.87 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.007 19% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-519.A00LF 2x4GB 339 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.9% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.9 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C7P67 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7P67

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	4x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	3x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	2x
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples	1x

SSD
Q Series Pro 128GBToshiba $66Bench 82%, 2,808 samples	1x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9 CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 24GBCorsairBench 35%, 3 samples	3x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,248 samples	1x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16