Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 02 '18 at 23:04
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 168 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 312 41% 310 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.31 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)	50.4% Above average	Lighting 61.6 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 57.8 50% 60.9 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 61.7 Splatting 62 51% 61.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2888 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 406 (B1) Unknown 97 97 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 48 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26573038288	93.4% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 414 Mixed 421 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 36.3 148% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 41 DQ Write 94 DQ Mixed 23.8 31% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 79GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 124 124 12897026232 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1638 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13406 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1585 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4791 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4791 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 214749478950 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.1% Very good	Read 129 Write 137 Mixed 102 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.19 71% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,977 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 156GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 84.6 Write 81.5 Mixed 81.4 106% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0420 F3-1600C11-4GNT 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.5% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.5 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 9.9 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	74x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	68x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	17x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16