Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '18 at 23:09
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 141
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 230
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.7% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 74.7
45% 55.9 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 46.2
37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 489
Write 327
Mixed 244
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 22
107% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 95.8
DQ Mixed 58.3
61% 103 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 118%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
54GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 509
Write 373
Mixed 391
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 33.2
118% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 77.2
78% 127 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 103%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
32GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 506
Write 362
Mixed 399
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 33.2
119% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 76.8
79% 128 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 103%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
30GB free
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 482
Write 190
Mixed 225
65% 299 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 6.16
4K Mixed 5.67
43% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $32
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback