Asus CG5275

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CG5275 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG5275
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091112
Uptime	12.1 Days
Run Date	May 09 '18 at 04:18
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 61.2 2-Core 107 53% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 204 24% 185 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 14.2 14% 15.3 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 17.6 Splatting 15.4 14% 18.1 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 240GB 1,960 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -127663606980823 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1030 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 949 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 316123 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 316123 (F2) Unknown 100 100 361555 (F9) Unknown 100 100 16953	36.9% Below average	Read 185 Write 155 Mixed 149 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 9.43 61% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 81.6 DQ Mixed 11.3 21% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 375GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 123 123 38685114835 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1355 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 51391 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 427 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3477 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3477 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 249109282862 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	45.7% Average	Read 81.6 Write 77.4 Mixed 60 54% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.27 84% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 61%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 2,127 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 896GB free, PID 5071 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 26.2 Mixed 28 36% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.19 38% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 18%
Samsung M3 Station 2TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 840GB free, PID 60f3 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 27.2 Mixed 26.9 35% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.42 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 23%
Mass Storage Device 64GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 41GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 31.4 Write 25.3 Mixed 28.1 36% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.54 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 6.12 625% 8.66 MB/s	DQ Read 10.2 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 6.6 760% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 11.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG5275 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG5275

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	53x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	4x
Xeon X3440IntelBench 65%, 6,034 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	10x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TBBench 98%, 11,576 samples	4x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	38x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	10x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16