PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3 Gen3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110909 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 10 '18 at 16:36 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
60.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.10.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
87.3%
Excellent
|
||||
92.1%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 90x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 21x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 23x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $391 |