Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F2
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 14:56
Run Duration63 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5015U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 90.7
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 106
57% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 172
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA320 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.6
Mixed 85
71% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.11
49% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback