PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110408 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | May 13 '18 at 13:14 |
Run Duration | 98 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.9%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 7x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples | 3x |
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $269 |