Packard imedia S2185

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Packard imedia S2185 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard imedia S2185
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '18 at 08:49
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2500 APU 2,593 User benchmarks, average bench 21% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Memory 24.7 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 24.6 14% 21.3 Pts	4-Core 30 8-Core 23.7 4% 26.9 Pts	64-Core 25.3 2% 25.3 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0800) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.81 1% 2.14 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 596GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 168 2291 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1334 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17343 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1310 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1307 (C2) HDA temperature 102 97 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	84.2% Excellent	Read 162 Write 131 Mixed 127 105% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.33 92% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 287GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 26.9 Mixed 25.5 34% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.23 54% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 2x4GB 1,001 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.27% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.13 GB/s	Latency 287 14% 287 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S2185 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S2185

CPU
E1-2500 APUAMDBench 21%, 2,593 samples	16x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	9x

GPU
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	14x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	9x
Radeon R5 200AMDBench 2%, 6,989 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	1x
S860 64G 6Gbps 64GBFordiskBench 43%, 6 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KDG/2G ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 6GBKingstonBench 20%, 87 samples	3x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	3x
HMT425U6AFR6C-PB Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 6GBHynixBench 21%, 29 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16