Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131118
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 00:01
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 31.9 2-Core 53.4 34% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 78.5 8-Core 75.4 10% 76.9 Pts	64-Core 76.2 5% 76.2 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2963 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 2.91 3% 3.75 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 7.52 4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20851 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4809 (B1) Unknown 93 93 253 (B3) Unknown 93 93 452 (B4) Unknown 93 93 6076 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 35 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 6 (EB) Unknown 99 99 33 (F1) Unknown 99 99 56162108457	50.7% Above average	Read 346 Write 206 Mixed 182 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 16.2 65% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 44 48% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 70%
Samsung M3 Portable 4TB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2.5TB free, PID 61b7 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 23 Mixed 6.7 22% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.37 4K Write 2.63 4K Mixed 0.53 113% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 71%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 578 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1TB free, PID 61b7 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 22.9 Mixed 20.5 29% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 3.14 4K Mixed 0.39 122% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 56%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 144GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 64.1 Write 74.8 Mixed 31.7 71% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.08 38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 12.3 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	35x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	23x
Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	58x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	18x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	10x
U100 SMG2 126GBSandiskBench 32%, 318 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5674BM0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 44%, 279 samples	20x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	13x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16