ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L870-161

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L870-161 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 25 '18 at 17:17
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 153 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 203 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 5.34 5% 6.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75 5,635 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: MH00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2347 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1603 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 9423 (0A) Spinup retry count 132 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1603 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 31090 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159216678 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 80 (DE) Loaded hours 80 80 8177 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 295 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	52.7% Above average	Read 89.5 Write 94.2 Mixed 87.8 68% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.3 77% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 56%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 138 Write 116 Mixed 80.2 136% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.45 4K Write 4.18 4K Mixed 0.36 160% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB 5,120 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback