Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D16 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory	104.2 GB free of 112 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 29 '18 at 17:13
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 880 User benchmarks, average bench 74% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 47.4 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 182 57% 107 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 795 67% 580 Pts	64-Core 2,031 126% 2,031 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 71.9 Parallax 70.5 56% 70.4 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 56.3 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5348911 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21809843929159 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 37 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 23 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 40 63 4299096104 (C2) HDA temperature 40 63 4299096104 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5348911 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5348911 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5348911 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294959413 (EA) Unknown 0 0 91 (F1) Unknown 0 0 91 (F2) Unknown 0 0 65 (F4) Unknown 99 99 4915238	36% Below average	Read 272 Write 167 Mixed 169 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 10.7 47% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 10.9 11% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 80GB free Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4412 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 248 (A5) Unknown 100 100 7995492 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 8 (A9) Unknown 100 100 961 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 190 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 64 274878955559 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 120260001820 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1728 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2058 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1677 (F2) Unknown 253 253 528 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	46.4% Average	Read 301 Write 189 Mixed 79.2 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 10.5 72% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 68.1 DQ Mixed 12.7 20% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 107%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 78.3 Write 101 Mixed 73.5 63% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.24 77% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 630GB free Firmware: 1AQ1 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 87.6 Write 91.4 Mixed 36.6 53% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.25 4K Mixed 0.39 108% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 573GB free Firmware: 1AG0 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 63.6 Mixed 50.7 44% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.31 75% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-H HMT31GR7BFR4C-H HMT31GR7AFR4C-H HMT31GR7BFR4C-H HMT31GR7BFR4C-H HMT31GR7BFR4C-H HMT31... 112GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.2% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 23.8 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.6 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	10x
Xeon E5-2687W 0Intel $1,335Bench 74%, 868 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $275Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	4x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	6x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
Raid VD 480GBMarvellBench 83%, 129 samples	3x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31GR7CFR4C-H HMT31... 128GBHynixBench 83%, 4 samples	3x
M393B2K70CM0-YF 12x16GBSamsungBench 53%, 8 samples	3x
M393B2K70CM0-YF 4x16GBSamsungBench 50%, 5 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16