Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '16 at 11:53
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 243 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 647 66% 532 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Asus(1043 86A4) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 12.2 13% 15.7 fps	MRender 26.2 Gravity 26.9 Splatting 34.6 24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 75.3 Write 135 Mixed 77.2 22% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 8.41 4K Mixed 0.24 6% 3.13 MB/s	DQ Read 2.34 DQ Write 6.54 DQ Mixed 0.74 2% 3.21 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 18%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 442 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 35 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1075637094
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 163 163 21490041066 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 64 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 126 126 32 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 555 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 59 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 86 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 86 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 206159675426 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	90.3% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 162 Mixed 146 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.22 110% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 108%
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB 1,846 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 779GB free Firmware: CA12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 97 123001539 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2088 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 303489581 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9622 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 83 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 132 (BC) Unknown 100 98 21475164169 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 346 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 572522529 (C2) HDA temperature 33 42 81604378657 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 33 123001539 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.4% Above average	Read 99.1 Write 108 Mixed 56.6 65% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.45 92% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 103 Write 15 Mixed 20.7 42% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.74 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.64 66% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 22,760 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.1% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.8 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 24.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	680x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	539x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	101x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	206x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	248x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	221x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16