PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | INTEL_ DH55TC__ |
Motherboard | Intel DH55TC (all builds) |
Memory | 0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100614 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 02 '18 at 01:59 |
Run Duration | 105 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 70% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.3%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.4%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 540Intel $90Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 45x |
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 17x |
Core i5 650Intel $100Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 48x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $118 |