Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJun 04 '18 at 16:57
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 164
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 456
38% 331 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 71
Parallax 61
5% 46.2 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 512
Write 414
Mixed 417
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 27.9
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 88.7
90% 147 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 124%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
628GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 94.2
Mixed 91
70% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.16
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
201GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 84.9
Write 86.5
Mixed 83.1
64% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.21
96% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $736
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback