PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 04 '18 at 18:56 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
75.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
18%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JPFOA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
62.3%
Good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
54%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,665x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 551x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 544x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 271x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 238x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |