Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180520
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '18 at 18:31
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 194 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 225 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) 2,233 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 512MB Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 13.3.43365.0 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.2% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 28.1 26% 35.5 fps	MRender 16.9 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 28.6 23% 27.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Harddisk SSD 275GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: F.6NXWRM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value
Poor: 26% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 8 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 21.2 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16