Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 15:26
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 34.4 34% 44.6 Pts	4-Core 52.4 8-Core 56.4 7% 54.4 Pts	64-Core 76.6 5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1225 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Lighting 28.9 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 38.4 24% 33 fps	MRender 28 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 37.8 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE30 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (A5) Unknown 100 100 12 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3 (A9) Unknown 100 100 218 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 50 214749741095 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 12886212611 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 28 (EA) Unknown 100 100 71 (F1) Unknown 100 100 35 (F2) Unknown 100 100 22 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	10.7% Very poor	Read 210 Write 36.1 Mixed 63.4 22% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.15 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 466GB free Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 122 122 12897222843 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1070 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2116 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1061 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1075 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1075 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 188979478563 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 175 Mixed 170 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.17 83% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 103%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 397GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5 (03) Spinup time 137 135 4108 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6918 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12115 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6018 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1961 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4956 (C2) HDA temperature 106 91 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 63955 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.2% Good	Read 117 Write 117 Mixed 123 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.42 105% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 26,466 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 533 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.2 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	21x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	17x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	11x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	9x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	8x
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16