Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 01:21
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 977 87% 734 Pts	64-Core 1,347 83% 1,347 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1577 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 85.2 Parallax 186 99% 131 fps	MRender 83.5 Gravity 126 Splatting 122 92% 110 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 391GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3724 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1664 (B1) Unknown 95 95 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1998 (EB) Unknown 99 99 158 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13552029462	69.6% Good	Read 479 Write 270 Mixed 274 75% 341 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 15.7 111% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38.9 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 15.5 20% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 250GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9008 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2587 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 121 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8046952189	93.8% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 412 Mixed 422 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 25.1 143% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 43.9 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 25.4 52% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 214GB free Firmware: 0 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	55% Above average	Read 400 Write 377 Mixed 273 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 5.42 53% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 36.3 DQ Mixed 9.61 12% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 86%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 5944937 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 57423712768021 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4079 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 106 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5944937 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5944937 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5944937 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25893 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21784 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21784 (F2) Unknown 0 0 41715	42% Average	Read 192 Write 94.2 Mixed 114 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 11 92% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 77.9 DQ Mixed 36.4 32% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 32.8 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 41.2 SC Mixed 28.4 90% 31.5 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	114x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16