PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock G31M-S. (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120516 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '18 at 00:46 |
Run Duration | 92 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3003) 3GB
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3160813AS 160GB-$139
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC2J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 10x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 7x |
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 9x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 8x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |