Asus Z87-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-C  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 16 '18 at 19:15
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 400
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN423b Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 491
Write 157
Mixed 236
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 23.7
132% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 25.8
68% 147 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
203GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 85.9
Write 81.6
Mixed 96.3
67% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.22
89% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-047.A00LF 1311 NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 10GB
1200, 1200 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.2
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-C Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z87-C - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $437
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback