Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 170 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 410 42% 341 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 1573) 1.2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Lighting 26.9 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 34.2 22% 34.2 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 28.4 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 8226363 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -139921444555822 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1100 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 110 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 34 46 38657720354 (C2) HDA temperature 34 46 38657720354 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8226363 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8226363 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8226363 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 19404 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8078 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8078 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10783 (F4) Unknown 96 96 9765013	41.4% Average	Read 237 Write 97.4 Mixed 139 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 14.2 72% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 80.2 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 24.3 40% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 214GB free Firmware: 18.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 135 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1354 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12703 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 866 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 61 51 690421799 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1271 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 123 Write 115 Mixed 110 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.37 97% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5773DH0-CH9 80AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 80AD HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.3% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.5 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	21x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 50%, 173 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16