Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '18 at 17:51
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 51.3 2-Core 102 49% 77.2 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 188 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Lighting 26.1 Reflection 24 Parallax 31.7 21% 27.3 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 30 Splatting 25.2 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHH SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 33 26 46 49 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 7.7 Write 4.2 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 38 12% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 42%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 75GB free Firmware: 4.ADA SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 33 46 51 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 27 Write 25 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 41.2 20% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 42%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 71GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 77.7 Write 76.5 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 74.8 50% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	79x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	32x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	28x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	10x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	198x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	60x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16