Asus F2A55-M LK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F2A55-M LK  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120930
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 07:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 123
56% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 210
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.3% Average
Lighting 62
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 82.4
51% 69.6 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 52.6
47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 201
Write 168
Mixed 131
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 18.1
76% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 17.7
18% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
72GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 115
Write 107
Mixed 73
SusWrite 90.4
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59%
Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
272GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 150
Write 40.5
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 37.2
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
97GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 161 165 166 167 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 25.6
Write 35.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 159
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.5
235% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A55-M LK Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback