| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 98% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Sony VPCF13J8E (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Sony VAIO |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101020 |
| Uptime | 19.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 01 '18 at 14:58 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
| CPU Throttled | 98% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 480
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
36.4%
Below average
|
29% 41.3 Pts
|
14% 113 Pts
|
8% 132 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Sony(104D 907A) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
|
2.46%
Terrible
|
3% 3.43 fps
|
2% 2.61 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
|
20.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
14% 4.83 GB/s
|
28% 141 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds