Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '18 at 01:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 95.2
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 129
63% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 325
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 476
29% 476 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 154
Parallax 144
125% 151 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 147
Splatting 115
103% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 337 329 344 345 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 357
Write 355
Mixed 257
SusWrite 338
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 31.5
96% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 187
149% 210 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
418GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 106 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 158
Write 124
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 109
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
55GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 17 19 22 19 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 9.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 21.1
25% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $537
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback