| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | ECS H61H2-M12 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130104 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 04 '18 at 17:43 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.5%
Good
|
63% 99.5 Pts
|
23% 170 Pts
|
9% 144 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
16% 17.9 fps
|
16% 18.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 53 59 61 59 MB/s
|
32.2%
Below average
|
40% 55 MB/s
|
140% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
64GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 101 101 101 101 MB/s
|
59.2%
Above average
|
70% 94.5 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 557e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.5 3 2.9 3.4 3.5 MB/s
|
9.55%
Terrible
|
12% 10.7 MB/s
|
95% 1.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
46.9%
Average
|
46% 16.3 GB/s
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
61% 66.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61H2-M12 Builds (Compare 442 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M12
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 40x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 39x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 71x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 39x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |