PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LX (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120420 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 05 '18 at 12:27 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 58% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
711GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 117 144 145 151 150 MB/s
|
56%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
217GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 112 111 113 113 MB/s
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-025.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 184x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 148x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 120x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 210x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 69x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 60x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |