Asus H61M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-CS (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '18 at 06:51
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 168 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 163 26% 188 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 4.31 4% 4.38 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 218 220 223 224 221 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.2% Above average	Read 225 Write 213 Mixed 196 SusWrite 222 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 33.2 108% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 87.4 DQ Mixed 47.5 40% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 124%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 557GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 6.9 0 16 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 106 Write 106 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 23.8 56% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 77%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 220GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 89 88 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 81.5 Write 88 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 89.6 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6AFR8C-H9 2x4GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 6.6 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-CS Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-CS

CPU
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	40x
Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples	32x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	18x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	57x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	31x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	22x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	7x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	5x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	9x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16