Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Dell Studio XPS 8100
Motherboard	Dell Studio XPS 8100 (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '18 at 12:14
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 151 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 274 37% 274 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330 845 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B 3058) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	4.57% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 6.65 Parallax 2.03 5% 4.9 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 4.48 4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.57% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 192 188 186 184 186 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.4% Above average	Read 236 Write 222 Mixed 214 SusWrite 180 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 27.2 94% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 101GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 38.3 Write 27 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 49.8 26% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 44%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 169 168 168 167 169 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 137 Write 162 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 161 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 285GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 128 128 127 125 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 87 Write 84.7 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 122 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 82%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1TB free, PID 0741 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27 Mixed 25 SusWrite 21.6 35% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 6GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	267x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	194x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	115x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	34x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 938 samples	42x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	31x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $507

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16