Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 17:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 100
48% 73.8 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 102
22% 149 Pts
64-Core 99.9
6% 99.9 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 37.6
32% 35.7 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 35.8
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 303 308 310 310 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 444
Mixed 376
SusWrite 320
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 46.8
156% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 263
198% 264 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
179GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 80.2
Write 81.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 81
53% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 87 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 80.3
Write 52.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 87.2
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1f00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 9.1 9.1 8.1 9.1 9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.38% Terrible
Read 17
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.6
10% 8.58 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback