HP EL470AA-ABA A1340N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EL470AA-ABA A1340N  (all builds)
MotherboardHewleet-Packard Asterope
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 04:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 52.9
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 29.6
26% 35 Pts
4-Core 32
8-Core 34
4% 33 Pts
64-Core 35.7
2% 35.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200
HP(103C 2A31) 64MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.383.0.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.27
0% 0.18 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L250S0 250GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BACE1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 35 13 30 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 52.4
Write 56.3
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 29
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.42% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.03 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback