Asrock H270 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H270 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '18 at 07:45
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 93.1 1-Core 136 2-Core 264 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 717 70% 576 Pts	64-Core 710 44% 710 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.8% Very good	Lighting 98.1 Reflection 106 Parallax 89.8 80% 98.1 fps	MRender 89.4 Gravity 87.4 Splatting 91.9 74% 89.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 291 256 250 250 249 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 429 Write 414 Mixed 366 SusWrite 290 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 54.4 188% 70.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 537GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 106 107 109 113 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 69.5 Write 176 Mixed 32 SusWrite 110 70% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2.1 384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB 22,335 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.9% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 22.2 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 20.1 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270 Pro4 - $295

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	103x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	93x
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	87x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16