| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150324 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 07:32 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
47.5%
Average
|
47% 72.7 Pts
|
21% 149 Pts
|
14% 230 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.4%
Above average
|
49% 65.4 fps
|
56% 67.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 222 222 220 220 218 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
75% 333 MB/s
|
140% 47.5 MB/s
|
190% 255 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.9%
Very poor
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
8% 2.67 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,453 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 424x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 386x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 203x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 107x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 67x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $334 |