Acer Aspire X3475

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3475 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire X3475
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	26.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '16 at 16:30
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265 6,606 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 89.3 46% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 132 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E248) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.49% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 9.31 Parallax 10.4 6% 9.22 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 7.87 Splatting 8.3 7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.49% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 139 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 89 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 42 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 27 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1659018587	63.2% Good	Read 486 Write 217 Mixed 271 71% 324 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 14.7 90% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 94.9 DQ Mixed 14.2 34% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 124%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 708GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 162 Write 163 Mixed 139 198% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.27 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 0.35 107% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 4x4GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 10.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 8.9 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire X3475 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3475

CPU
A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $265Bench 48%, 6,606 samples	6x
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	2x
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7350AMDBench 1%, 1,650 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	2x
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBUnifosaBench 48%, 618 samples	1x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 1,959 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $302

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16