Lenovo 90BF0017SP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90BF0017SP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 14:39
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 86.2
45% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 169
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8642) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 14.4
13% 14.6 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 18.4
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 159 166 173 172 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 124
Mixed 53
SusWrite 162
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback