Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 07:41
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 250
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,011
93% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,518
94% 1,518 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2884) 3GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 87.3
0% 52 fps
MRender 80.4
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 52.3
55% 69.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 292 295 292 295 295 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
381GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 480 477 475 417 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 470
Mixed 445
SusWrite 435
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58
195% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: AN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 165 162 168 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 139
Mixed 108
SusWrite 165
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: AN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 187 184 180 186 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 174
Mixed 105
SusWrite 184
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 57.6
MC Mixed 32.4
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback