Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160113
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 16:46
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 131
51% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 302
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 90.2
55% 73.3 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 51.6
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 156 95 67 68 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 428
Write 374
Mixed 308
SusWrite 126
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 6.9
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 150
119% 169 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
709GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 129 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 133
Write 133
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 130
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 87%
Iomega E xternal HD 1TB
35GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 34 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 34
Write 17.8
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 33.1
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback