Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P (all builds)
Memory	6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '18 at 23:03
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 113 55% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 231 25% 199 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.5% Above average	Lighting 67.1 Reflection 74.4 Parallax 61.6 55% 67.7 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 59.7 51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 59 42 40 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.6% Poor	Read 114 Write 109 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 65.1 20% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 16.4 54% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.7 DQ Write 30.3 DQ Mixed 31.4 23% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 91%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 824GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 94 94 95 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 86.2 Mixed 45 SusWrite 93.6 58% 80.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 9.8 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD4P Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	115x
Xeon W3690Intel $990Bench 77%, 4,808 samples	14x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	8x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	34x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	21x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $320

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16