Average Bench: 30.5% (95th of 622)

Based on 24,967 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 679A Models: AMD Radeon HD 7900, AMD Radeon HD 7950, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0), ASUS HD7950

Poor average bench

The AMD HD 7950 averaged 69.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 118fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 114fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD HD 7950 is just 8.26%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD HD 7950 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 75.4fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 58.3fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 24,967 samples)
Min Avg Max
98.4 Lighting 118 134
66.5 Reflection 75.4 84.1
141 Parallax 161 183
32.4% 118 fps
Min Avg Max
51.8 MRender 58.3 64.3
101 Gravity 114 130
72.7 Splatting 82.7 92
28.1% 85.1 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 0428) 3GB
CLim: 987 MHz, MLim: 1362 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Lighting 129
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 183
36% 131 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 125
Splatting 87.8
30% 91.2 fps
MSI(1462 2773) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
Lighting 124
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 175
34% 126 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 126
Splatting 88.8
30% 92.1 fps
PwrHis(1787 2316) 3GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 118
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 156
32% 116 fps
MRender 56.3
Gravity 109
Splatting 79.5
27% 81.6 fps
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Lighting 104
Reflection 75
Parallax 194
31% 124 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 143
Splatting 21.5
28% 77.7 fps
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.2
Lighting 113
Reflection 71
Parallax 151
31% 112 fps
MRender 54.7
Gravity 110
Splatting 77.1
27% 80.7 fps
24,967 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 21,504,111 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 24,967 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $290 @ launch in Jan '12)
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 17% 32% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 14% 31% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E249) 10% 31% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E210) 10% 30% ± 4%
MSI(1462 2773) 7% 32% ± 4%
Asus(1043 0428) 6% 30% ± 4%
XFX(1682 3220) 6% 29% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B E207) 5% 29% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 4% 29% ± 4%
XFX(1682 3221) 3% 30% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 2316) 3% 29% ± 3%
MSI(1462 2761) 3% 30% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E208) 2% 30% ± 3%
MSI(1462 2771) 2% 30% ± 0%
AMD(1002 3000) 1% 31% ± 2%
HP(103C 6616) 1% 27% ± 0%
Asus(1043 041E) 1% 27% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2760) 1% 29% ± 2%
Asus(1043 0426) 1% 31% ± 0%
Device(1545 7950) 0% 30% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B00) 0% 28% ± 1%
XFX(1682 3222) 0% 27% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0424) 0% 27% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B A003) 0% 34% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2317) 0% 32% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3001) 0% 35% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 18% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3000) 0% 30% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3003) 0% 30% ± 0%
HP(103C 6617) 0% 28% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 7950 Builds (Compare 15,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $712

Popular HD 7950 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 5 years ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

Owned for over 7 years, still runs everything fine. Outperformed my gtx 1060 whilst playing Ark: Survival Evolved. Best aging GC out there, now time to buy a 2080ti and have it age horribly.


Good

1 month ago.

Bought it for ~300€ December 2012. Impossible to OC with the AMD tool due to bad chip, sadly. Still handles all modern games pretty well, but lately, with big open world titles like Conan Exiles, it runs into limitations. Most games previous to that I could play on ultra settings (except Shadows and Anti-Aliasing) with constant 30fps. Not that much, but well playable. But after 6 hard working years, it is time for a new one if you want, like me, to play coming games with nice graphic.


Liked

1 day ago.

Comment 

Высокий разгонный потенциал, после которого карточка взлетает по производительности очень высоко, Mantle и DirectX12. Идеальная карта по соотношению производительность/цена. Рекомендую брать со вторичного рынка—Oct '15


Poor

12 months ago.

just get a used titan x pascal if ur on a budget, it should get u abt 35+ fps in minecraft 1366x768 low


Excellent

7 months ago.

i have been running this card since launch date and it is only now giving issues


Terrible

2 years ago.

low & very high price


Average

5 months ago.

This should of held some value but it didn't.


Your
opinion?
622 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback