Average Bench: 29.9% (105th of 630)

Based on 27,096 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 679A Models: AMD Radeon HD 7900, AMD Radeon HD 7950, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0), ASUS HD7950

Very poor average bench

The AMD HD 7950 averaged 70.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 116fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 115fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD HD 7950 is just 6.43%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD HD 7950 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 74.8fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 161fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 27,096 samples)
Min Avg Max
99.7 Lighting 116 134
66.4 Reflection 74.8 83.5
142 Parallax 161 179
30.5% 117 fps
Min Avg Max
52.1 MRender 58.2 64.1
104 Gravity 115 129
73.3 Splatting 82.6 91.5
30% 85.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.1.2
Lighting 147
Reflection 91.9
Parallax 192
39% 144 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 143
Splatting 99.4
37% 104 fps
MSI(1462 2771) 3GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 116
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 156
30% 115 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 115
Splatting 79.3
30% 83.6 fps
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.1.1
Lighting 108
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 145
28% 107 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 106
Splatting 74.3
28% 77.8 fps
Sapphire(174B E207) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 108
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 146
28% 107 fps
MRender 52.3
Gravity 106
Splatting 74.1
27% 77.4 fps
Gigabyte(1458 225E) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 106
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 153
28% 109 fps
MRender 52.3
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 73.4
26% 75.1 fps
27,096 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 23,624,091 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 27,096 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $290 @ launch in Jan '12)
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 19% 31% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 18% 29% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E210) 11% 29% ± 2%
Sapphire(174B E249) 11% 31% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B E207) 5% 28% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0428) 5% 31% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2773) 4% 31% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 2316) 4% 29% ± 1%
XFX(1682 3221) 4% 30% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2761) 4% 30% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 3% 29% ± 3%
XFX(1682 3220) 3% 29% ± 1%
AMD(1002 3000) 2% 29% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2771) 1% 30% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0424) 1% 28% ± 3%
Asus(1043 041E) 1% 26% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3222) 1% 27% ± 0%
HP(103C 6616) 1% 27% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2317) 1% 31% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2760) 1% 28% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E208) 0% 29% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2772) 0% 29% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B00) 0% 26% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0426) 0% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 277C) 0% 32% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3001) 0% 32% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2325) 0% 26% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 0% 31% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 225E) 0% 27% ± 0%
HP(103C 6617) 0% 30% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 7950 Builds (Compare 17,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $183

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $743

Popular HD 7950 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 5 years ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

30 days ago.

Owned for over 7 years, still runs everything fine. Outperformed my gtx 1060 whilst playing Ark: Survival Evolved. Best aging GC out there, now time to buy a 2080ti and have it age horribly.


Excellent

16 days ago.

Bought it for ~300€ December 2012. Impossible to OC with the AMD tool due to bad chip, sadly. Still handles all modern games pretty well, but lately, with big open world titles like Conan Exiles, it runs into limitations. Most games previous to that I could play on ultra settings (except Shadows and Anti-Aliasing) with constant 30fps. Not that much, but well playable. But after 6 hard working years, it is time for a new one if you want, like me, to play coming games with nice graphic.


Liked

2 months ago.

Comment 

Высокий разгонный потенциал, после которого карточка взлетает по производительности очень высоко, Mantle и DirectX12. Идеальная карта по соотношению производительность/цена. Рекомендую брать со вторичного рынка—Oct '15


Excellent

1 month ago.

just get a used titan x pascal if ur on a budget, it should get u abt 35+ fps in minecraft 1366x768 low


Excellent

9 months ago.

i have been running this card since launch date and it is only now giving issues


Terrible

2 years ago.

low & very high price


Average

7 months ago.

This should of held some value but it didn't.


Your
opinion?
630 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback