Average Bench: 38.3% (93rd of 620)

Based on 24,134 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 679A Models: AMD Radeon HD 7900, AMD Radeon HD 7950, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series, AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v2.0), ASUS HD7950

Poor average bench

The AMD HD 7950 averaged 61.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 114fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 114fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD HD 7950 is just 15.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD HD 7950 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 75.2fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 57.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 24,134 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.2 Lighting 114 136
66 Reflection 75.2 86.9
138 Parallax 161 187
40.6% 117 fps
Min Avg Max
51.5 MRender 57.7 64.9
99 Gravity 114 132
72.7 Splatting 82.2 92.5
36.6% 84.6 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Lighting 125
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 164
43% 122 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 116
Splatting 84.8
38% 86.5 fps
Asus(1043 0428) 3GB
CLim: 927 MHz, MLim: 1318 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 124
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 165
43% 122 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 115
Splatting 84
37% 86.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Lighting 127
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 162
43% 121 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 109
Splatting 87
36% 84.7 fps
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Lighting 126
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 160
43% 122 fps
MRender 55.6
Gravity 112
Splatting 87.3
36% 84.9 fps
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Lighting 121
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 162
42% 119 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 112
Splatting 83
36% 84.4 fps
24,134 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

Average fps @ 1080p with maximum detail settings for 6 popular games:

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive: 117 fps Grand Theft Auto V: 43 fps League of Legends: 96 fps Battlefield 1: 43 fps DOTA 2: 92 fps World of Tanks: 61 fps

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 18,443,686 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 24,134 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $290 @ launch in Jan '12)
Sapphire(174B 3000) 18% 39% ± 4%
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 16% 40% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E249) 10% 39% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E210) 10% 38% ± 5%
XFX(1682 3221) 7% 38% ± 3%
Asus(1043 0428) 7% 39% ± 5%
XFX(1682 3220) 5% 36% ± 6%
MSI(1462 2773) 5% 39% ± 4%
Sapphire(174B E207) 4% 35% ± 8%
AMD(1002 3000) 2% 38% ± 3%
PwrHis(1787 201C) 2% 40% ± 3%
PwrHis(1787 2316) 2% 37% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2761) 2% 35% ± 5%
HP(103C 6616) 2% 34% ± 3%
MSI(1462 2760) 1% 34% ± 7%
MSI(1462 2771) 1% 37% ± 2%
AMD(1002 0B00) 1% 34% ± 7%
Device(0000 0000) 1% 44% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B E208) 0% 37% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B E219) 0% 37% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0426) 0% 39% ± 0%
MSI(1462 277C) 0% 41% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2317) 0% 48% ± 0%
Asus(1043 041E) 0% 35% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3000) 0% 39% ± 0%
XFX(1682 3222) 0% 33% ± 0%
HP(103C 6617) 0% 46% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0424) 0% 35% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical HD 7950 Builds (Compare 14,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $756

Popular HD 7950 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 5 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

Owned for over 7 years, still runs everything fine. Outperformed my gtx 1060 whilst playing Ark: Survival Evolved. Best aging GC out there, now time to buy a 2080ti and have it age horribly.


Excellent

6 months ago.

Bought it for ~300€ December 2012. Impossible to OC with the AMD tool due to bad chip, sadly. Still handles all modern games pretty well, but lately, with big open world titles like Conan Exiles, it runs into limitations. Most games previous to that I could play on ultra settings (except Shadows and Anti-Aliasing) with constant 30fps. Not that much, but well playable. But after 6 hard working years, it is time for a new one if you want, like me, to play coming games with nice graphic.


Excellent

14 months ago.

Comment 

Высокий разгонный потенциал, после которого карточка взлетает по производительности очень высоко, Mantle и DirectX12. Идеальная карта по соотношению производительность/цена. Рекомендую брать со вторичного рынка—Oct '15


Poor

8 months ago.

just get a used titan x pascal if ur on a budget, it should get u abt 35+ fps in minecraft 1366x768 low


Excellent

3 months ago.

i have been running this card since launch date and it is only now giving issues


Terrible

22 months ago.

low & very high price


Average

1 month ago.

This should of held some value but it didn't.


Your
opinion?
620 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback