Real World Speed
Performance profile from 128,356 user samples
31,464 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 69% Sapphire(174B E285)
Worst Bench: 49% Sapphire(174B E283)
Poor: 49% Great: 69%
SPEED RANK: 42nd / 595
96,892 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Sapphire(174B E347)
Worst Bench: 51% Sapphire(174B E347)
Poor: 51% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 595
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
62.5 % 63.8 % +2%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
245 fps 258 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+5%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps 139 fps Slightly faster multi rendering.
+15%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
155 fps 179 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+15%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
168 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+33%
126 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
279 fps 303 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+9%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps 148 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+14%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
169 fps 205 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+21%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+38%
133 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
145 fps 157 fps Slightly Better Counter-Strike: Global Offensive fps.
+8%
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
44 fps 55 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+26%
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
86 fps 95 fps Slightly Better Overwatch fps.
+10%
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
149 fps 180 fps Better League of Legends fps.
+21%
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
65 fps 76 fps Better Battlefield 1 fps.
+16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
46 fps 54 fps Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt fps.
+18%
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 68 fps Much Better World of Warcraft fps.
+57%
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
82 fps 102 fps Better World of Tanks fps.
+25%
Battlefield 4
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
75 fps 94 fps Better Battlefield 4 fps.
+25%
Market Share
Based on 11,430,138 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.28 % 0.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+229%
Value
Value For Money
59.1 % 76.3 % Better value.
+29%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
84 % 148 % Much more popular.
+76%
Price
Price (score)
$399 $280 Cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
60 Months 28 Months Much more recent.
+53%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
206 fps 216 fps +5%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
162 fps 184 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+14%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
183 fps +4% 176 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
149 fps 171 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+15%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. At present we only have one benchmark so although the performance figures are provisional the RX 480 and GTX 970 do appear to be closely matched. If further tests validate these results and the cards retail at the MSRP of $199, then the new RX 480 will effectively improve graphics card price/performance ratios by a whopping 23%, something that has not happened since the release of the Maxwell based Nvidia GTX 970 nearly two years ago. In addition better price/performance for the current generation of games, the RX 480 also offers relatively strong DX12 support which provides better future proofing than Nvida’s Maxwell (970/980/980 Ti) cards. [Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback