Real World Speed
Performance profile from 82,171 user samples
44,083 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 49% Sapphire(174B E285)
Worst Bench: 41% Asus(1043 0468) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 41% Great: 49%
SPEED RANK: 72nd / 627
38,088 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 83% Gigabyte(1458 2308)
Poor: 83% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
45.2 % 96 % Hugely faster effective speed.
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
183 fps 321 fps Much better lighting effects.
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
121 fps 188 fps Much faster multi rendering.
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
164 fps 373 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
206 fps 371 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
130 fps 196 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
177 fps 425 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
148 fps 223 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps 121 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
44 fps 104 fps Hugely Better PUBG Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
42 fps 88 fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 fps 194 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
87 fps 127 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
65 fps 97 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
45 fps 88 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
43 fps 89 fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
80 fps 125 fps Much Better WoT Fps.
Market Share
Based on 22,309,764 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.17 % 0.35 % Hugely higher market share.
Value For Money
26.9 % 61.5 % Hugely better value.
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % 106 % More popular.
Price (score)
$399 $370 Slightly cheaper.
74 Months 27 Months Much more recent.
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
160 fps 245 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
280 fps 629 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
183 fps 310 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
150 fps 232 fps Much better reflection handling.
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
249 fps 545 fps Hugely better texture detail.
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
170 fps 293 fps Much faster complex splatting.

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]


Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback